Saturday, March 23, 2019
Which Comes First: The Art or the Artist? Essays -- Art Artistic Artis
Which Comes First The Art or the operative?A Historical PerspectiveThe approach of the year 2000 seems a level-headed time to think about the way the role of prowess and the workman has changed through history, and how raw art is interpreted by a advanced audience. Writing about modern art gives me the creeps. In other types of art, die facts screw be asserted with security, unrestricted reactions atomic number 18 clearly docu manpowerted, skills can be appreciated, and art is clearly recognized as such. Modern art defys all of these conventions. Writing about modern art bothers me because after Ive tell everything that I feel about a piece, Im not sure I could defend myself if someone walked up and told me I was an idiot who missed the artists intimate alto formulateher. Am I symbolic of the piss or the crucifix, the Lady or the tiger?Amoung the things the artist has been in history be historian, architect, scientist, propagandist, and social commentator. Is the modern artist still the same, or is the role of the artist changing wholly from all the old templates and metamorphasizing into something altogether different?The Artist as historiographer?For vast majority of art history, the artist has been very unimportant. Cave paintings are considered a way to learn about the lives of prehistoric man. Cave paintings are of interest to the archieologist and the curious. No painting has any signatures, at least no(prenominal) possess been interpreted as such. No none ever tries to get into the mind of a prehistoric artist. No one knows who the artist is until the Egyptian artist Imhotep began putting his name on his work. Until then, no none was bear on with the artist as anything but a tool to express the purification of the time.Artists often are given the duty of re... ...ortfolio. The xyz portfolio was a collection of pictures of men engaged in brutal homosexual acts. While these pictures certainly answer an impact on an audience, they dont change public opinon on the subject. They change public opinon of the artists.Modern art lacks much of the subtle touch of previous art. Its statements, although to a greater extent powerful than ever in history, are not accepted by mainstream society. In order for an artists to be the pivot of public opinon and social change, they have to be more acceptable to mainstream, or else art has little sound in society.During the Watson festival held at Carnegie Mellon University, Elaine King was asked to speak on the future of art. She asserted that art was being created for artists, art critics, curators and collectors. Surely this mustiness change if art is ever to be the fulcrum it has the potential to be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment