Designing Continuous Auditing for a Highly Automated Procure-to-Pay Article

Designing Continuous Auditing for a Highly Automated Procure-to-Pay Process - Article Examplef a continuous supervise ashes also helps auditors to restrain out an independent monitor and enables them to carry out audit tasks on a continuous basis.There have been changes in business and auditing, which prompts auditors to guide use of continuous monitoring dodging and continuous auditing. The changes in auditing environment have made auditors cast use of graphic modeling in auditing financial statements, and this calls for the implementation of continuous auditing and monitoring system (Borthick, 2012). The master to pay process is a very complex automatize process which requires a continuous automated monitoring in order to effectively audit the process, the internal and external control, as well as all other financial records of any company that uses this process.However, it is not certain that the implementation of continuous monitoring system will help the auditors to effe ctively and efficiently carry out their auditing tasks. This is because implementing a continuous monitoring system on the procure-to pay process presents most impediments to the auditors (Borthick, 2012). Divergence by business practices where they divert from the original system as employees devise workarounds in order to meet exigencies may become an obstruction to the auditors. When employees stoop from the original system, companies end up changing the entire system in order to enable the system to support the employees work. This means that the auditing process will always be subject to continuing system sweetening and this can be a huge challenge for the auditors (Borthick, 2012).It is also true that the reliance on the system development life cycle that is warranted for the operation of system controls can create huge problems to the auditors. In some companies, the continuous monitoring is always based on the assumption that price looks up for pallets by each(prenomina l) day are correct in all aspects (Borthick, 2012). This assumption is tenuous given the interaction of changes