Monday, March 25, 2019
a paper -- essays research papers
Response Paper 1The reading materials in hebdomad 6 explore the impact of international rectitude on says, and more(prenominal) specifically, state behaviors. The idea is not to oversimplify the influence of international law but to understand in what circumstances (under various theories) would the legal modeling and rules of international society shape and limit the behavior of nations and their alternatives. And these accommodate numerous scenarios that constitute a diversity in state behavior such as abstaining from invasion to imposing tariffs. One notes that state actions are in the first place motivated by state interests. A state talent asseverate international law or norms because it is advantageous to its interest or even off when it comes as a great sacrifice. The readings offer several theories hypothesizing why states might or might not conform to international law.From a state psychology point of view, Politics of Law Observance suggests that some states may not observe the law because of a priori assumption of how other nations would behave. For lesson if state of matter A does not feel that the international community exit impose threatening sanctions (or not threatening enough) to induce a change in behavior, then Country A would violate the law. Other (less cynical) reasons for non-compliance include ambiguity of legal rules, where the enforcement provisions are also vague that violating country knows that other nations wouldnt know how to quite respond. Moreover there could be limitations on capaci...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment