Labor and the Grievance Process

The muniment of the iniquity process in American history is a lengthy one as it power saw its initial origins in the genuinelyly first travail movements of the 19th century. The growth of organized chore continued for many decades catch up withing a great deal of its ability strengthened during the primordial Twentieth century as socialist and syndicalist groups greatly empowered and organized the movement. With the development of the Labor Relations identity card under the unfermented Deal era of the 1930s, organized labor saw its power solidified in the United States until its eventual decline in the latter half of the 20th century, a steep decline that continues to this rattling day.The score Procedure, really got a toe hold during World state of war ll, when the War Labor Board was developed for the purpose of keeping cockeyed employment, minus the threat and practice of strikes, for the purpose of keeping productivity at a peak during the war effort.It was durin g these years the Grievance Procedure reached its real recognition as agency of preventing strikes and at the same time self-aggrandizing the worker an opport building blocky to air his differences with the employer. Remember back then Rosie the Riviter, had no say in the matter Since the years of World War ll, the Grievance Procedure of irreconcilable differences have become nationally recognized manner of dealing with labor problems. (Parsons)Rules of employment are meant to be honored by two the employee and management. Management will have certain standards and requirements in modulate for an employee to remain employed and, conversely, an employee who is part of a collective bargaining unit has the right to expect that management honor the bargaining agreement.When there is an frank and material breach of the bargaining contract, then it is well within the rights of the employee to register a grievance. The very nature of the fact that the employee has filed a grievance means that at virtually point there has been acommunication dislocation between management and employee. Furthermore, there must be some genuine basis for the grievance in order for the union to take up the cause.Many grievances are won or lost in the early stages of the grievance procedure. The steward must understand how the arbitrament process flora and what is needed to succeed if a grievance goes all the way to a interview. Proper preparation will result in a high winning percentage and make presenting the grievance in the arbitration hearing much easier.This course is designed for those who have completed Grievance intervention and/or Steward Training. Topics include evidence and proof in arbitration the rules of evidence gathering and organizing evidence case analysis and settlement stipulation anatomy of the arbitration hearing the seven tests of just cause and how to try whether the arbitrators decision runs counter to the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (Kretchsmar)That is to say, to bewail without a violation of the bargaining contract will render the grievance useless and, ultimately, dismissed. This is why unions are careful to make sure that an demonstrable breach has occurred before pressing forth with a grievance complaint.Now, as to whether or not the grievance procedure is workable or not, this depends on the individuals who are involved. If either management or the union are very stubborn and are prone to interpret the law as the see fit or willfully participate in unfair labor practices, then the entire grievance procedure will be undermined by the incompetent actions of the individuals who are taking part in the process.In a way, the grievance process as it relates to labor in the United States is both a simple and complex issue that can be viewed by various facets. If one were to judge whether or not the overall cathode-ray oscilloscope of the grievance process has been successful, the answer would be yes as the United States has produced some incredible private sector success stories that involved helped from organized labor.BibliographyBadger, John. The New Deal The Depression Years. Chicago Ivan R Dee Publishing,2002.Kretchsmar, John. (2006) Labor Workshops. Retrieved 11 February 2007.http//www.unomaha.edu/wbils/labor2.htmlParsons, Tony. (1999) argue Worker Rights. Retrieved 11 February 2007.